In this order, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court noted that the petitioner had complied with the court's direction by passing an order on 30.11.2022. Consequently, the contempt petition was closed with liberty to challenge the compliance order in the manner known to law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont. P(MD)No.596 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 30.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Cont. P(MD)No.596 of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.1765 of 2018
N.A.Kathija Beevi ... Petitioner
Vs.
4.D.Albert Manohar,
The Additional / Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Karaikudi Range No.2, Arunachalam Street.
(R1 to R3 deleted vide order dated 13.07.2022) ... Respondent
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents and punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the orders passed in W.P.(MD)No.1765 of 2018 dated 01.02.2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Venkatesan
For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilipkumar
1/2
Cont. P(MD)No.596 of 2021
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
rmi
O R D E R
The direction given by this Court has been complied with by passing of the order dated 30.11.2022. It is for the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law.
closed.
30.11.2022
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No rmi
ORDER MADE IN
Cont. P(MD)No.596 of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.1765 of 2018
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.A.Kathija Beevi
The Additional / Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Karaikudi
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
