K.Sukisha v. P.Vasanthamani,M.D.,D.G.O.
Case brief
What is this about?
A Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act regarding a willful disobedience order was heard. The petitioner submitted the prayer had become infructuous. Consequently, the Court closed the contempt proceeding without costs.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition is closed. No costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED 11.11.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
CONT.P(MD)No.490 of 2022 in W.P(MD)No.1135 of 2022
K.Sukisha
..Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs
Dr.P.Vasanthamani, M.D.,D.G.O., The Additional Director of Medical Education, Secretary, Selection Committee, 162, Periyar EVR High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai -600 010.
...Contemnor /Respondent
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying this Court to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying the order of this Court made in W.P(MD)No.1135 of 2022, dated 3.2.2022.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is maintainable when the petitioner submits it has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Sukisha
- respondent
Dr.P.Vasanthamani
Coram
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court