The petitioner challenged the non-compliance of a previous order dated 25.11.2021 via a contempt petition. The court recorded that the mandatory order had been complied with and closed the contempt petition without costs.
The contempt petition was closed and no costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD) No.1680 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 16.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Cont.P.(MD) No.1680 of 2022
M.Mokkaraj
... Petitioner
versus
The Administrator,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees'
Pension Fund Trust,
Thiruvalluvar Illam, Anna Salai,
Chennai – 2.
... Respondents
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the Contemnors/Respondents for willfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court dated
1/3
Cont.P.(MD) No.1680 of 2022
25.11.2021 in W.P.(MD)No.21022 of 2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam For R1 : Mr.K.Ramaiyah Standing Counsel For R2 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submit that the order of this Court dated 25.11.2021 passed in W.P.(MD)No.21022 of 2021 has already been complied with.
costs.
16.12.2022
ogy
2/3
Cont.P.(MD) No.1680 of 2022
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy
Cont.P.(MD) No.1680 of 2022
16.12.2022
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Mokkaraj
Shivalingam
Bhama
B.Pugalandhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
