Dismissed

P.Periya Karuppan, v. Thiruvambalam Pillai

Madras HC9 Dec 2022CONT P(MD)/1640/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this thin contempt petition regarding non-compliance of a pension order, the court was informed of compliance. It dismissed the petitioner's complaint about unpaid interest, granting liberty to file a separate application for arrears, and closed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Grievance regarding interest calculation dismissed; liberty to file application for arrears granted.

P.Periya Karuppan, Vs Thiruvambalam Pillai — Madras HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 09.12.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CONT.P.(MD)No.1640 of 2022 in W.P(MD).No.20068 of 2021

¶7

P.Peiya Karuppan

¶8

: Petitioner/Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.Thiruvambalam Pillai, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai.

¶11

2.Bama,

¶12

The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust,

¶13

Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600 002. :Contemnors/Respondents1&3

¶14

PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the contempt of Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnors/respondents 1 and 3 and punish them for the wilful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P(MD).No.20068 of 2021 dated 08.11.2021.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh

¶16

This Contempt Petition is filed for the non-compliance of the Order in

¶17

W.P(MD).No.20068 of 2021 dated 08.11.2021.

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

¶20

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel

¶21

appearing for the respondents produced a written communication and submits that the order of this Court in W.P(MD).No.20068 of 2021, dated 08.11.2021 has been complied with.

¶22

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner still raised objection that the interest for the commutation amount has not been properly paid. However, the learned counsel is not in position to explain before this Court how the interest has been arrived at by him.

¶23

4.If the petitioner is still having grievance, it is always open to him to file an appropriate application for the arrears of interest for the commutation amount, if any.

¶24

5.With the above liberty, the Contempt Petition is closed.

¶25

09.12.2022

¶26

Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Rmk

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

¶29

¶30

1.Thiruvambalam Pillai, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai.

¶31

2.Bama, The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

B.PUGALENDHI,J.,

Rmk

CONT.P.(MD)No.1640 of 2022 in W.P(MD).No.20068 of 2021

¶37

09.12.2022

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.Periya Karuppan, v. Thiruvambalam Pillai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Periya Karuppan, v. Thiruvambalam Pillai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sathaiyapillai Vs K.Kesavan

Pathirakali Muthu Vs Indira Selvi Dayana

Srinivason Samppath@Sakthi Ganesh Vs Annapoorani@Nandhini

S.S.Saraswathy Vs a.Arun Kumar

Kuthisiya Rani Vs Riyas Mohamed Ali

Jerina Mari Victoriya Vs Minor.J.Yeberson Nathaniyal Chellaiya