Disposed

The Correspondent v. J.Jeyakanthan,I.a.S

Madras HC10 Jan 2022CONT P(MD)/1305/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court closed the Contempt Petition filed against the District Collector and his staff. The court held that since the notification was cancelled by the District Collector and the petitioner could no longer pursue the original order, the matter was closed.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Petition was closed with the petitioner informed about the cancellation of the notification.

The Correspondent Vs J.Jeyakanthan,I.a.S — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Cont.P.(MD).No.1305 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 10.01.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶6

Cont.P.(MD).No.1305 of 2019 in W.P.(MD).No.16040 of 2018

¶7

The Correspondent, C.S.I. High School, Manamadurai 630 006, Sivagangai District. ... Petitioner

¶8

vs.

¶9

1.J.Jayakanthan, I.A.S., District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶10

2.J.Roja, Personal Assistant to the District Collector (Noon Meal), Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. ... Contemnors

¶11

PRAYER : Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnors / respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD). No.16040 of 2018, dated 23.07.2018.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.E.V.N.Siva

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Manikkam Special Government Pleader

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

Mr.A.K.Manikkam, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents states that the notification calling for applications which is dated 17.02.2017 has been cancelled, by an order of the first respondent ie., the District Collector, Sivagangai District, dated 06.06.2020.

¶16

Let a copy of the aforesaid order be supplied to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner, for his information. In any event, with the cancellation

¶17

1/2

¶18

Cont.P.(MD).No.1305 of 2019

¶19

of the notification calling for applications, the petitioner cannot any more pursue order dated 23.07.2018 and recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed.

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶21

/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

akv

¶23

Note:

¶24

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶25

¶26

1.J.Jayakanthan, I.A.S., District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶27

2.J.Roja,

¶28

Personal Assistant to the District Collector (Noon Meal), Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶29

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-1312[F] dated 11/01/2022 )

¶30

ORDER MADE IN Cont.P.(MD).No.1305 of 2019 10.01.2022

¶31

NSN(CO) TR(01.02.2022) 2P 4C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

The Correspondent v. J.Jeyakanthan,I.a.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Correspondent v. J.Jeyakanthan,I.a.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Mohamed Khan, S/O.Meeran Vs the Deputy Inspector General

R.S.Kumar Vs the Director General of Police

Charles Britto Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

S.Selvam, Vs Government of Tamilnadu

T.Kala Vs The Chief Educational Officer

M.Kavin Kumar Vs K.Nanthakumar,I.a.S