Single-judge order closing a contempt petition. The Court noted the petitioner is ready to remit development charges and directed the third respondent to grant approval within four weeks.
Contempt petition closed; respondent to grant approval within four weeks of remittance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.1209 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Cont.P(MD)No.1209 of 2022 in W.P(MD)No.13945 of 2010
B.Radha Sankar
... Petitioner /
Petitioner
Vs.
V.Vishnu, District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
... Contemnor / 3rd Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Contemnor / third respondent herein for his deliberate and willful disobedience to the order of this Court dated 07.09.2020 in W.P(MD)No.13945 of 2010 under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
For Petitioner : Mrs.D.Geetha
For Respondent : Mr.A.K.Manikkam Special Government Pleader
1/4
Cont.P(MD)No.1209 of 2022
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
05.12.2022
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No mga
2/4
Cont.P(MD)No.1209 of 2022
To
The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
3/4
Cont.P(MD)No.1209 of 2022
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
mga
Cont.P(MD)No.1209 of 2022 in W.P(MD)No.13945 of 2010
05.12.2022
4/4
B.Radha Sankar
V.Vishnu
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
