Sangu Kumar v. Ganesan
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the petitioner sought punishment for non-compliance with a prior order granting appointment. The High Court noted that the appointment order was subsequently granted and complied with. The Court directed the School to pay benefits within four weeks and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 26.07.2018 found complied with; petitioner to receive benefits within four weeks; contempt petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD).No.1129 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
Cont.P.(MD).No.1129 of 2019 in W.P.(MD).No.16428 of 2018
Sangu Kumar ... Petitioner/ Petitioner vs.
1.Ganesan, Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2.S.P.Srinivasan, District Educational Officer, Tenkasi Educational Officer, Tirunelveli.
... Contemnors/ Respondents
PRAYER : Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the contemnors / respondents herein for their wilful disobedience to the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.16428 of 2018, dated 26.07.2018 and punish them accordingly.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contemnors failed to comply with the underlaying order regarding the petitioner's appointment.
Whether service benefits like increments and leave should be declared compliant once appointment was granted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sangu Kumar
- respondent
Ganesan
- respondent
S.P. Srinivasan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court