M.Kishore v. Pandiyan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a prior order directing removal of encroachments. The Special Government Pleader submitted a communication stating encroachments were removed. The Court closed the petition recording compliance.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed due to recording compliance by the Respondents.
What the court decided
Contempt Petition No.978 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.12. 2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
Contempt Petition No.978 of 2022
M.Kishore
..Petitioner
vs
- Pandiyan, The Tahsildar, Sankarapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District 606 401.
- G.Sampath Kumar, The Executive Officer, Sankarapuram Town Panchayat, Kallakurichi District 606 401.
- Ravichandran, The Block Development Officer, Sankarapuram Town Panchayat, Kallakurichi District 606 401.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Respondents have complied with the earlier order directing removal of encroachment.
Whether the contempt petition can be dismissed as the alleged disobedience has been made good.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Kishore
- respondent
Pandiyan
- respondent
G. Sampath Kumar
- respondent
Ravichandran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court