Single judge order closing a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, as the High Court found that its earlier order dated 23.02.2021 had been complied with via a Government Order of 12.09.2022.
Contempt Petition closed as the complained order was found to have been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.966 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.11.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
Cont.P.No.966 of 2022
K.Thulasi ... Petitioner
Vs
1.Dr.Supriya Sahu IAS, The Additional Chief Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600009.
2.Dr.Ashok Upreti IFS,
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Buildilng, Jennis Road, Saidapet, Chennai - 600015. ... Respondents
PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 seeking to punish the Respondents for their willful disobedience in not complying with the order dated 23.02.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.3494 of 2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mani.
For Respondents : Mr.T.Seenivasan, Special Government Pleader.
1/2
Cont.P.No.966 of 2022
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.
ay
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents submitted that the Order of this Court dated 23.02.2021 has been complied with vide Government Order in G.O.(2D) No.148, Environment, Climate Change and Forest (FR.2(ii)) Department, dated 12.09.2022.
2.In view of the same, this Contempt Petition is closed.
07.11.2022 ay
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No
Cont.P.No.966 of 2022
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Thulasi
Dr.Supriya Sahu
Dr.Ashok Upreti
S.Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
