S.Kandasamy v. J.Kumaragurubaran,Ias.
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition filed for alleged disobedience of a dated order was closed as per the court when respondents filed a compliance report stating that the arrears payable to the petitioner were settled and acknowledged.
What did the court decide?
None. The contempt petition is closed upon compliance by respondents.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.811 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.07.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
Cont.P.No.811 of 2022
S.Kandasamy
- …. Petitioner
-Vs-
- 1.Thiru K.Kumaragurubaran, IAS Special Commissioner-cum-Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.
- 2.Mr.Karunakaran
Assistant Commissioner / Executive Officer Arulmighu Mariamman Thirukkoil, Irukkankudi, Virudhunagar District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Kandasamy
- respondent
K. Kumaragurubaran
- respondent
Karunakaran
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court