C.Palanisamy v. S.Karthik
Case brief
What is this about?
This is an original petition seeking probate of a Will executed in 2005. The petitioner, as Executor, proved the Will with witness and heirship evidence. The High Court of Madras allowed the petition and granted the probate.
What did the court decide?
Probate of the Will of P.Krishnan Achari dated 12.08.2005 granted to the petitioner as Executor.
What the court decided
O.P.No.210 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.09.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Original Petition No.210 of 2022
Vellai Perumal
... Petitioner
Versus 1.K.Perumal 2.R.Saraswathi @ Petchiammal 3.P.Balakrishnan @ Gopi 4.R.Yogalakshmi @ Kavitha 5.S.Jaya 6.S.Vasanth @ Iyyakutti 7.M.Anandhi @ Anandajyothi ... Respondents
Prayer: The Original Petition filed under Sections 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 and under Order XXV Rule 4 of the Original Side Rules, praying that the petitioner may be allowed to prove the Will in common form and that probate thereof to have effect throughout the State of Tamil Nadu may be granted to him. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajesh
1/4
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether probate of the Will of P.Krishnan Achari ought to be granted to the petitioner as the Executor of the said Will.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vellai Perumal
- respondent
1.K.Perumal
- respondent
R.Saraswathi
- respondent
P.Balakrishnan
- respondent
R.Yogalakshmi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court