Selvi v. Sumathi
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a contempt petition for wilful disobedience of an order dated 02.07.2021. The court examined the report of the Advocate Commissioner, which found no encroachment. Consequently, the court held no order necessary and closed the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed as no order is necessary following the Advocate Commissioner's report.
What the court decided
Contempt Petition No.461 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.10.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
Contempt Petition No.461 of 2022
Selvi
... Petitioner
Vs.
Sumathi, Tahsildar, Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District
... Respondent
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent for non-compliance of the order dated 02.07.2021 in WP No.13222 of 2020 and to punish the contemnor for having wilfully disobeyed the order dated 02.07.2021.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt should be proceeded with regarding alleged non-compliance of an order.
Whether the Report of the Advocate Commissioner necessitates the disposal of the petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Selvi
- respondent
Sumathi, Tahsildar, Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District
Coram
T.RAJA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court