Mohan Ramasamy Iyer v. Anshul Mishra
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition challenging non-compliance with a stay order was closed because a letter showing compliance was produced during the hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.372 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.04.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
Contempt Petition No.372 of 2022
Mohan Ramasamy Iyer, represented by his Power Agent, S.Viswanathan, 75/98, Greanways Road Extension, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai 28 ... Petitioner vs. Anshul Mishra, Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ... Respondent
... Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the Respondent for their wilful disobedience of the order dated 04.06.2018 passed by this Court in W.P.No.11603 of 2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.Kumaresan, Addl. Advocate General, for Mrs.P.Veena Suresh (CMDA)
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohan Ramasamy Iyer
- respondent
Anshul Mishra
Coram
S.Vaidyanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court