Muniyappa v. C.Senthil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an order under W.P. No. 12657 of 2021, the Court found that the respondent had passed the requisite order. The petition was closed as the order was duly complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Cont. P. No. 229 of 2022
in W.P. No. 12657 of 2021
Muniyappa, S/o.Bachappa No.1/93,N B Agraharam,Chennathur Village & Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Versus Mr.C.Senthilkumar, Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondent/Respondent
PRAYER : Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.12657 of 2021 dated 28.06.2021.
1/3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the stated order passed by the respondent results in the closure of the contempt petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Muniyappa
- respondent
C. Senthilkumar
Coram
V. Bharathidasan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court