N. Santhakumar v. v.Ramar
Case brief
What is this about?
This single judge disposed of a contempt petition alleging disobedience of an order, ruling that no action was required as the impugned order had merged with a subsequent Division Bench judgment directing a fresh application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.218 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.06.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
Cont.P.No.218 of 2022
N.Santhakumar …. Petitioner
-Vs-
V.Kumar Commissioner Dharapuram Municipality No.207A, Park Road Dharapuram – 638 656.
…. Respondents
Prayer : Contempt Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 11.11.2021 in W.P.No.23572 of 2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.B.R.Menon For Respondents : Mr.P.Srinivas Standing Counsel
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should entertain a contempt petition when the underlying order is merged with a subsequent Division Bench judgment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N. Santhakumar
- respondent
V. Kumar
Coram
R. Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court