R.Anjali Devi v. G.Prakash IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of interim orders. Counsel abandoned the petition during arguments, leading to its dismissal as not pressed.
Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of interim orders. Counsel abandoned the petition during arguments, leading to its dismissal as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.2155 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:01.12.2022
Coram
The HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Contempt Petition No.2155 of 2022
R.Anjali Devi
.. Petitioner
Vs
1.G.Prakash, I.A.S, The Commissioner Milk Production and Dairy Development Department, 2 Pasumpon Muthuramalinga Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035.
2.N.Ramachandran Deputy Registrar (Dairy) Tiruvanamalai, Collectorate Complex, Tiruvanamalai.
.. Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the interim
orders passed by this Court in W.M.P.No.16793 of 2020 in W.P.No.13547 of 2020 dated 25.09.2020.
For Petitioner : Ms.Kanchana for Mr.V.Vijay Shankar For Respondent : Ms.V.Yamuna Devi
1/3
Cont.P.No.2155 of 2022
ORDER
The petitioner has filed this contempt petition on the ground that
the respondents have disobeyed the order dated 25.09.2020 passed in W.M.P.No.16793 of 2020 in W.P.No.13547 of 2020.
submits that she is not pressing the contempt petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.
01.12.2022
Index:Yes/No mmi
2/3
Cont.P.No.2155 of 2022
ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.
mmi
Contempt Petition No.2155 of 2022
01.12.2022
3/3
R.Anjali Devi
G.Prakash
N.Ramachandran
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court