In this contempt petition, the petitioner complained that the respondent failed to comply with an order. The court recorded a statement from the petitioner that the disputed land is temple land and he had no patta. Dismissing the petition based on this statement, the court found no occasion for punishment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Cont.P.No.2062 of 2022
T.Seshathri
... Petitioner
Vs.
Loganathan Tahsildhar, Walajabad, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram – 631 605.
... Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, praying to punish the respondent herein for committing contempt of the order in W.P.No.14887 of 2021 dated 04.08.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Gayathri
For Respondent : No appearance
2
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
smv
ORDER
It is stated that an enquiry had been conducted and necessary orders had been passed and also the order had been served on the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is also stated that the land in S.No.529 of 2015 situated at Walajabad, is a temple land and that the petitioner does not have any patta for the aforesaid land. Recording the said statement, this Contempt Petition stands dismissed.
16.12.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking smv
Cont.P.No.2062 of 2022
T. Seshathri
Loganathan Tahsildhar
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
