M.Murali Babu v. Thiru.J.Radhakrishnan IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
A single judge closed a contempt petition filed for disobedience of previous orders, granting liberty to petitioners to seek remedies subject to the outcome of a pending Division Bench writ appeal on the same subject matter.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed with liberty to the petitioners to workout their remedies subject to the outcome of the writ appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.1962 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
Cont.P.No.1962 of 2022
1.M.Murali Babu
- 2.A.Ganesh
3.S.Pachaiappan
...Petitioners
Vs
- 1.Thiru.J.Radhakrishna, IAS, The Secretary to Government, Co-operation, Food & Consumer Protection Department,
- Fort St. George, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be adjudicated parallelly given the pending writ appeal on the same matter.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Murali Babu
- petitioner
A.Ganesh
- petitioner
S.Pachaiappan
- respondent
Thiru.J.Radhakrishna
- respondent
Thiru.A.Shanmugasundaram
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court