A.Marimuthu v. Suneet Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed contempt petition regarding wilful disobedience of court order relating to representation considerations. Court held no cause for prosecution and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition is closed. No costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No 1438 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
Cont.P. No.1438 of 2021
A.Marimuthu, Junior Clerk, O/o.Senior Materials Manager/ Loco Store Depot, Loco Works, Perambur, Southern Railway, Chennai 600 026 .. Petitioner Vs.
Suneet Sharma, Chairman, Railway Board, Railway Bhavan, Raisana Road, New Delhi. .. Respondent
Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act,
to punish the respondent for her wilful and intentional disobedience to the order of
this Court in W.P. No.15182 of 2021 dated 23.07.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr. K.Venkatasubramanian Senior Advocate for Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondent : Mr. V.Radhakrishnan, Senior Advocate for Mr. M.Vijay Anand Additional Standing Counsel for Railways
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Marimuthu
- respondent
Suneet Sharma
Coram
S.S.SUNDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court