In a contempt petition for disobedience of a previous order, the High Court found that the respondents complied with the order dated 10.07.2018. Consequently, the Court closed the contempt petition with no further action.
Contempt petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.1413 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Cont.P.No.1413 of 2021
S. Balasubramanian, Assistant Engineer, Highways Department, National Highways Section-1, Trichy
... Petitioner
Vs
Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to
punish the respondents for their willful and intentional disobedience to the
order of this court in W.A.No.591 of 2018 dated 10.07.2019.
For petitioner : M/s. Venkataramani, Senior Counsel for M/s. M. Muthappan For Respondents : Mr. R.U. Dinesh Rajkumar, Additional Government Pleader
1/3
Cont.P.No.1413 of 2021
O R D E R
(made by M.DURAISWAMY, J.)
When the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, Mr. R.U. Dinesh
Rajkumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents and Mr. Ventakaramani, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the respondent had complied with the orders of this court made in W.A.Nos. 589 to 591 of 2018, by passing an order on
22.01.2022, and hence the contempt petition may be closed.
we find no reason to keep the contempt petition pending. Accordingly, the
contempt petition is closed.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
mrn
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. GS/23/02/2022
To
2/3
Cont.P.No.1413 of 2021
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be closed since the respondents have complied with the previous order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Balasubramanian
Mr. Dheeraj Kumar
Er. B.R. Kumar
M. DURAISWAMY
J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
