S. Uma v. M. Sathiyanarayanan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed against the judgment of the Principal District Judge. The court confirmed the impugned order and held there were no costs in the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed; judgment and decree of Principal District Judge confirmed; no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
C.M.S.A.NO.6 OF 2015
S.Uma
.. Appellant/ Respondent/Petitioner
Vs.
M.Sathiyanarayanan
.. Respondent/ Appellant/Respondent
Prayer:-
Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, r/w Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure r/w Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree of the Principal District Judge, Cuddalore, made in C.M.A.No.34 of 2012, dated 12.06.2014, reversing the Order and Decree of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore, made in H.M.O.P.No.73 of 2008, dated 31.01.2012.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Judgment and Decree of the Principal District Judge reversing the lower court order in a civil marriage dispute should be interfered with?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.Uma
- respondent
M.Sathiyanarayanan
Coram
V.M.Velunei
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court