The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed multiple Civil Miscellaneous Petitions for non-prosecution, as the petitioner did not appear in person or through an advocate despite previous postings for the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.S.No.1 of 1999
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty First day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.VELMURUGAN
C.M.P(MD)Nos.8800, 8801, 8802, 8803, 8804, 8805, 8806 & 8807 of 2018 in A.S.No.1 of 1999
M.KALAISELVAN ... PETITIONER / 4TH RESPONDENT IN ALL THE PETITIONS
Vs
MURUGAIAH VANDIYAR (DIED)
1 RANJITHAM ... 1ST RESPONDENT / 1ST RESPONDENT IN ALL THE PETITIONS
GOVINDARAJAN (DIED)
2 DURAISAMY ... 2nd RESPONDENT / 3rd RESPONDENT IN CMP(MD)No.8800 to 8802 OF 2018
... 1 & 2 RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN CMP(MD)No.8803, 8804, 8805, 8806 & 8807 of 2018
RAJAMANI (DIED)
3 KUDIARASAN
4 GOMATHI
5 SHANTHI
6 THILAGAVATHI (RESPONDENTS 3 TO 6 ARE LR OF GOVINDARAJAN)
7 PATTAMMAL
8 SUMATHI
9 SURESH (RESPONDENTS 9 TO 10 ARE LR OF RAJAMANI)
10 KULANTHAISAMY (RESPONDENTS 7 TO 10 ARE LR OF RAJAMANI)
1/3
A.S.No.1 of 1999
... RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS IN CMP(MD) NO.8800 OF 2018
... RESPONDENTS 3 TO 10 / PROPOSED RESPONDENTS IN CMP(MD) NO.8801 OF 2018
... PROPOSED RESPONDENTS 3 TO 10 / RESPONDENTS IN CMP(MD)No.8802, 8803, 8805 & 8806 of 2018
... PROPOSED RESPONDENTS /3 TO 10 RESPONDENTS IN CMP(MD)No.8804 & 8807 of 2018
Prayer in CMP(MD) No.8800 of 2018:
To restore the A.S.No.1/1999, dated 17.07.2009 on the file of this Honble court.
Prayer in CMP(MD) No.8801 of 2018:
To pass order to transpose me as appellant in A.S.No.1/1999 on the file of this Honble Court.
Prayer in CMP(MD) No.8802 of 2018:
To condone the delay of 5479 days to setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent.
Prayer in CMP(MD) No.8803 of 2018:
Pleased to set aside the abatement caused to the death of the 2nd respondent and thus render justice.
Prayer in CMP(MD) No.8804 of 2018:
To bring on record the proposed respondents No.3 to 6 as legal heirs of the deceased 2nd respondent and rank them as respondents Nos.3 to 6 in the above A.S.No.1 of 1999 and thus render justice.
Prayer in CMP(MD) No.8805 of 2018:
To condone the delay of 3309 days to setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 5th respondent.
Prayer in CMP(MD) No.8806 of 2018:
To set aside the abatement caused to the death of the 5th respondent.
Prayer in CMP(MD) No.8807 of 2018:
To bring on record the proposed respondents No.7 to 10 as legal heirs of the deceased 5th respondent and rank them as respondents Nos.7 to 10 in the above A.S.No.1 of 1999.
Prayer in A.S.No.1 of 1999:
To prefer this Memorandum of Regular Appeal to this Hon’ble Court against the Judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court, Pattukkottai in O.S.No.139 of 1994 dated 02.09.1998.
2/3
A.S.No.1 of 1999
ORDER : These petitions coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petitions and the affidavits filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of not appeared either in person or by an advocate for the petitioner in all the petitions and of MR.ARUN PRASAD, Advocate for the 1st respondent in all the petitions, the court made the following order:-
These petitions have been filed by the petitioner to restore the A.S.No.1 of 1999, to transpose the petitioner as appellant, to condone the delay of 5479 days for setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the second respondent, to set aside the abatement, to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent, to condone the delay of 3309 days for setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 5th respondent, to set aside the abatement and to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 5th respondent.
3. Accordingly, all the Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution.
/ /2022
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
THE JUDGE, SUBORDINATE COURT, PATTUKKOTTAI.
ORDER
IN
C.M.P(MD)Nos.8800, 8801, 8802, 8803, 8804, 8805, 8806 & 8807 of 2018 in A.S.No.1 of 1999 Date :21/06/2022
MK/JM/SAR.III/23.06.2022/3P/2C
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil miscellaneous petitions filed by the petitioner were prosecuted at the time of hearing.
M.KALAISELVAN
MURUGAIAH VANDIYAR
RANJITHAM
DURAISAMY
RAJAMANI
KUDIARASAN
P. VELMURUGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
