Allowed

Rajakamalam v. Nagasamy (Died)

Madras HC31 Jan 2022CMP(MD)/4734/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed a miscellaneous petition to set aside an order dismissing a second appeal against specific respondents. The court directed the appellant's counsel to issue fresh notice to respondents 6 and 7, implead legal heirs of the deceased second respondent, and subsequently dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

The petition to set aside the dismissal order and permit fresh notice to specific respondents and to implead legal heirs was allowed.

Rajakamalam Vs Nagasamy (Died) — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.4734 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Thirty First day of January Two Thousand and Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R. VIJAYAKUMAR

¶6

CMP(MD) No.4734 of 2021 IN SA(MD) No.1130 of 2006

¶7

RAJAKAMALAM ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT

¶8

¶9

NAGASAMY (DIED)

¶10

JAYARAMAN

¶11

S.A.ALAGARSAMY (DIED), S/O.ALAGARSAMY

¶12

S.A.ALAGARSAMY, S/O.ALAGARSAMY

¶13

K.RAMANUJAM @ GOPAL RAMANUJAM

¶14

REGHUPATHY

¶15

RENGASAMY

¶16

K.RAMAR

¶17

R.VIJAYA @ VIJAYALAKSHMI ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶18

10.N.GOPALSAMY ... 10^th RESPONDENT/LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED 1^st RESPONDENT/PROPOSED 10^th RESPONDENT IN THE APPEAL

¶19

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 16.04.2014 of dismissal of the second appeal in respect of respondents 2, 6 and 7 and permit fresh notice to these respondents.

¶20

PRAYER IN SA(MD) No.1130 of 2006 :

¶21

To prefer the Memorandum of Grounds of Second Appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 28.06.2006 made in A.S.47 of 2004 on the file of Sub Court, Sivakasi, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 06.07.2004 made in O.S.40 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sivakasi.

¶22

ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.H.LAKSHMI SHANKAR, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-

¶23

The present application has been filed to set aside the order, dated 16.04.2014 of dismissal of the Second Appeal in respect of respondent Nos.2, 6 and 7 and permit fresh notice to these respondents.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

1/2

¶26

CMP(MD) No.4734 of 2021

¶27

The learned Counsel for the appellant is directed to take fresh notice to respondent Nos.6 and 7 and implead the legal heirs of the deceased second respondent. Notice returnable by 15.02.2022 .

¶28

Private notice is also permitted. In the mean time, the learned Counsel for the appellant is directed to take steps to implead the legal heirs of the second respondent.

¶29

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in the support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶30

sd/-

¶31

31/01/2022

¶32

/ TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶33

Madurai - 625 023. TO

¶34

THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, SIVAKASI.

¶35

THE DISTRICT MUNSIF, SIVAKASI.

¶36

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.4734 of 2021 IN SA(MD) No.1130 of 2006 Date :31/01/2022

¶37

USK/SBN/SAR-II/09.02.2022/2P/3C

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

2/2

Rajakamalam v. Nagasamy (Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajakamalam v. Nagasamy (Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arumuga Nadar Vs Muthiah Nadar

Vadamuthu Vs Kunasekaran

S.Jayakumar Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Neelamegam (Died) Vs Poovalingam

M. Swaminatha Pillai Vs S. Sudalaiyandi Asari

Chelliah Vs Muthiah