P.Vellammal, v. R.S.Nithyanantham (Died)
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought condonation of 314 days delay to appeal abatement of lower court judgment. Despite reasons being unsatisfactory, court granted chance to contest appeal on specified cost condition. Appeal appointed for next hearing.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 314 days condoned with condition of deposit Rs. 5,000/- as costs within 10 days.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P(MD)No.3460 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Seventh day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.VELMURUGAN
C.M.P(MD)No.3460 of 2019 in A.S(MD)No.183 of 2015
P.VELLAMMAL ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT
Vs
1 R.S.NITHYANANTHAM (DIED) ... 1st RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
2 TIRUPPATHI DEVI
3 KAMESHKUMAR
4 LAVANYA 5 ASWINI 6 RASHYAMANI AMMAL ... RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 / PROPOSED
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in condoning the appeal can be condoned
Whether Sufficient cause for condonation of delay could be pleaded suitably
Whether the appeal was filed within 30 days of decree date
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.VELLAMMAL
- respondent
R.S.NITHYANANTHAM
- respondent
TIRUPPATHI DEVI
- respondent
KAMESHKUMAR
- respondent
LAVANYA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court