Allowed

B.Senthil Kumar, v. R. Bhavani

Madras HC8 Jul 2022CMP(MD)/2458/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil miscellaneous petition filed to return an original unnumbered interlocutory application from the Family Court, Madurai, the court allowed the petition. The registering authority was directed to return the document to the petitioner after acknowledgment. The order resolved the procedural impasse concerning the reverted revision petition.

What did the court decide?

The registry is directed to return the unnumbered I.A. No. Of 2021 in H.M.O.P. No.736 of 2018 to the petitioner after getting necessary acknowledgment.

B.Senthil Kumar, Vs R. Bhavani — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CMP(MD). No.2458 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

¶4

Friday, the Eighth day of July Two Thousand and Twenty Two

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI

¶7

CMP(MD)No.2458 of 2022 in CRP(MD)No.1979 of 2021

¶8

B.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶9

R.Bhavani ... Respondent/Respondent

¶10

Prayer in CMP(MD)No.2458 of 2022 :- Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 151 of C.P.C., to return the original impugned petition in unnumbered IA. of 2021 in HMOP.No.736 of 2018 on the file of the Learned the Judge, Family Court, Madurai pending disposal of the revision petition and thus render justice.

¶11

Prayer in CRP(MD)No.1979 of 2021:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to allow the civil revision petition to number the unnumbered IA.No. Of 2021 in HMOP.No.736 of 2018 dated 22.09.2021 on the file of the learned the Judge, Family Court, Madurai.

¶12

ORDER:- This Civil Miscellaneous Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.G.Rajaguru, Advocate for the Petitioner, this Court made the following order:-

¶13

This application has been filed to return the original impugned petition in unnumbered I.A.No. Of 2021 in H.M.O.P.No.736 of 2018, on the file of the Family Court, Madurai.

¶14

2.CRP(MD) No.1979 of 2021 has been filed by the petitioner to direct the learned Family Judge, Madurai to number the Interlocutory Application filed by him on 31.08.2021. This Court, by order dated 16.12.2021 dismissed the said Civil Revision Petition on the ground that the petitioner has not answered the return made by the trial Court. The petitioner was also directed to re-present the petition before the trial Court and if the trial Court is convinced https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/2

¶16

CMP(MD). No.2458 of 2022

¶17

with the reasons given in the re-presentation, IA may be numbered and if not, decide the issue on merits. Pursuant to the earlier order of this Court, dated 16.12.2021, the petitioner has filed this present petition to return the original impugned petition in unnumbered I.A.No. of 2021 in H.M.O.P.No.736 of 2018.

¶18

3.Since the main CRP(MD) No.1979 of 2021 itself was disposed of by this Court as early as on 16.12.2021 and also the petitioner has to represent the unnumbered I.A.No. of 2021 in H.M.O.P.No.736 of 2018, this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to return the unnumbered I.A.No. of 2021 in H.M.O.P.No.736 of 2018 to the petitioner after getting necessary acknowledgment.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

/07/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶23

¶24

The Judge, Family Court, Madurai.

¶25

Copy to

¶26

The Section Officer, E.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai

¶27

ORDER DATED : 08/07/2022 ========================== ORDER ========================== CMP(MD)No.2458 of 2022

¶28

in CRP(MD)No.1979 of 2021 Giving direction and etc. as stated within. KB(15.07.2022) 2P 3C

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

2/2

B.Senthil Kumar, v. R. Bhavani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Senthil Kumar, v. R. Bhavani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Saravanan Vs Venkatraman (died)

S.R.Ashok Vs T.Mahalakshmi

Saraswathi Vs Fathimabeevi

Sudalai, Vs Bala Subramanian

Sami Ayya Vs Albonsa @ Albonse Roy

R. Uma Maheswari Vs J. Kumara Gurubaran