Allowed

Natarajan, v. S.Arokiaraj (Died),Pushparani

Madras HC14 Mar 2022CMP(MD)/2201/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order in a composite matter petition allowed the condonation of a significant delay of 1013 days for setting aside abatement caused by the death of a sole respondent, contingent upon payment of Rs.1,000 to the District Siddha Medical Officer.

What did the court decide?

The petition to condone the delay of 1013 days is allowed on condition that the petitioners pay Rs.1,000 to the District Siddha Medical Officer, CCRI, Periyakulam, on or before 21.03.2022.

Natarajan, Vs S.Arokiaraj (Died),Pushparani — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.2201 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Fourteenth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI

¶6

CMP(MD) No.2201 of 2022 IN SA(MD) No.713 of 2015

¶7

1 NATARAJAN

¶8

2 JOTHIBASU ... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS

¶9

¶10

S.AROKIARAJ (DIED)

¶11

1 PUSHPARANI

¶12

2 AROKIARANJANI

¶13

3 AROCKIYA SINDHUJA

¶14

4 KRISHTHU RAJA ... RESPONDENTS No.1 TO 4/

¶15

PROPOSED RESPONDENTS No.2 TO 5

¶16

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 1013 days to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the Sole Respondent in the above Second Appeal in S.A.No.713 of 2015.

¶17

PRAYER IN SA(MD) No.713 of 2015:

¶18

Pleased to set aside the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.2 of 2014 dated 28.08.2014 passed by Principal District Court, Pudukkottai, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.132 of 2010 dated 11.11.2013 passed by Sub Court, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District, by allowing the second appeal with cost.

¶19

ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.S.SRINIVASAN, Advocate for the petitioner, the Court made the following order:-

¶20

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 1013 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused to the death of the sole respondent, viz., S.Arokiaraj. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

1/2

¶22

CMP(MD) No.2201 of 2022

¶23

Though the reasons stated in the affidavit are not satisfactory, an opportunity for the petitioners has to be given in the interest of justice. Hence, this petition is allowed and the delay is condoned on condition that the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) to the credit of the “District Siddha Medical Officer, CCRI, Periyakulam” (payable in Account No.10767823177, SBI, Periyakulam), on or before 21.03.2022.

¶24

Call on 24.03.2022, “for reporting compliance”. sd/14/03/2022 / TRUE COPY /

¶25

/ /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

1 THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, PUDUKKOTTAI.

¶28

2 THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, PUDUKKOTTAI.

¶29

COPY TO:

¶30

THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT SIDDHA MEDICAL OFFICER, CCRI, PERIYAKULAM

¶31

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.2201 of 2022 IN SA(MD) No.713 of 2015 Date :14/03/2022 SS/PN/SAR:I/18.03.2022 : 2P/4C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

Natarajan, v. S.Arokiaraj (Died),Pushparani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Natarajan, v. S.Arokiaraj (Died),Pushparani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvakumar, Vs Kathayee Ammal

The General Manager, Vs Ayyakannu (Died)

P.Manikandamoorty Vs the Commissioner

M.Parimanam, (died) Vs K.Sethuraman

Dalavoy K.Shanmuganathan, Vs L.Malaipetchi

D.Upagaram Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police