Allowed CM petitions to condone 105 days delay regarding the first respondent's death causing abatement and to implead three proposed legal representatives in a civil case.
Pets allowed for delay condonation, abatement set aside, and impleading proposed legal representatives; registry to amend cause title.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.SOUNTHAR
CMP(MD) No.10809 of 2022
1 SAKTHIVEL, POWER AGENT AND SON OF VASANTHARAYA PERUMAL, ALAGUPATTI VILALGE CUSPA, DINDIGUL TALUK, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER(S)
Vs 1 1. PERUMAL (DIED), 2. DHANAL AKSHMI,, W/O. RAMKUMAR, DOOR NO. 102, 7TH BLOCK, M.M.D.A. MADURAVAYAL, CHENNAI TOWN.
2 DHANALAKSHMI, W/O. RAMKUMAR, DOOR NO. 102, 7TH BLOCK, M.M. D.A. MADURAVAYAL, CHENNAI TOWN.
3 JEEVA, W/O. LATE. PERUMAL, NEAR TEMPLE CITY, AMOGAM NAGAR, EAST STREET, THANDIKOMBU, DINDIGUL DISTRICT - 624 709.
4 NAGARAJ, S/O. LATE. PERUMAL, NEAR TEMPLE CITY, AMOGAM NAGAR, EAST STREET, THANDIKOMBU, DINDIGUL DISTRICT - 624 709.
5 KALEESHWARI, D/O. LATE. PERUMAL, NEAR TEMPLE CITY, AMOGAM NAGAR, EAST STREET, THANDIKOMBU, DINDIGUL DISTRICT - 624 709.
... RESPONDENT(S)
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 105 days in filing the petition, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent and also to bring on record the proposed respondents 3 to 5 as the legal representatives of deceased first respondent.
title.
btr
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 105 days in filing the civil miscellaneous petition.
Whether to set aside abatement caused by the death of the first respondent.
Whether to implead proposed respondents as legal representatives of the deceased.
Sakthivel
Perumanal
Dhanalakshmi
Jeeva
Nagaraj
Kaleeswari
S. Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
