Allowed

S.Sivagami v. Sri Venkataramana Transports

Madras HC3 Feb 2022CMP/69/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CMP.No.69 of 2022 arising from CMA.No.1223 of 2020 sought to permit enhancement of a motor accident claim from Rs.7,00,000 to Rs.13,00,000. The court allowed the amendment bearing the respondent insurance company had settled with the claimant and court fee payable.

What did the court decide?

The claimant is permitted to amend the claim petition and enhance the claim to Rs.13,00,000/- from Rs.7,00,000/-

S.Sivagami Vs Sri Venkataramana Transports — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Third day of February Two Thousand Twenty Two

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

CMP.No.69 of 2022

¶7

in CMA.No.1223 of 2020

¶8

S.SIVAGAMI [ PETITIONER ]

¶9

¶10

1 SRI VENKATARAMANA TRANSPORTS, [ RESPONDENTS ] 234, THIRUVENKADASAMY ROAD, R.S.PURAM, COIMBATORE.

¶11

2 THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., DO, 1 BHARATHI ROAD, CUDDALORE-607001.

¶12

3 G.GREGORY

¶13

4 THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., DO 13A, NETHAJI ROAD, CUDDALORE-607001.

¶14

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased To permit the petitioner to enhance the claim amount from Rs.7,00,000/to Rs.13,00,000/- in MCOP No.1621/2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/In the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore (in CMP.No.69 of 2022).

¶15

Order : This petition coming on this day for hearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.RAMYA V.RAO, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.M.KRISHNAMOORTHY, Advocate for the 2^nd Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶16

This petition has been filed seeking to enhance the claim amount to Rs.13,00,000/- from Rs.7,00,000/-.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

2. Considering the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and the fact that there is a settlement between the claimant and the 2^nd respondent Insurance Company, the petition is ordered. The claimant is permitted to amend the claim petition and enhance the claim to Rs.13,00,000/- from Rs.7,00,000/-. The petitioner to pay the Court fee payable because of the enhancement.

¶19

-sd/03/02/2022 / TRUE COPY /

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶21

¶22

THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, CUDDALORE.

¶23

COPY TO

¶24

THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, AE SECTION, HIGH COURT, MADRAS-104.

Order

CMP.No.69 of 2022

in CMA.No.1223 of 2020

¶29

Date :03/02/2022

¶30

From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format PA (08/02/2022)

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Sivagami v. Sri Venkataramana Transports

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Sivagami v. Sri Venkataramana Transports

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarojini Ramamurthy Vs Mahalakshmi

Dinesh Devendiran Vs Thulasi Kamalakannan

Reliance General Ins.Co.ltd., Vs Poongodi

M.Bharnitharan Vs D.Vijayalakshmi

Prem Venkatesan Vs N.Arunkumar

Chandra Vs Anbukkarasan