Disposed
V.Geetha v. C.N.Narasimhan
Madras HCCMP/6620/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court allowed an application to condone a delay of 95 days in filing a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, noting sufficient reasons were given in the supporting affidavit.
What did the court decide?
The delay of 95 days in representing CMA.SR.No.102266 of 2015 is condoned.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
C.M.P.No.6620 of 2016 in CMA.S.R.No.102266 of 2015 P.T. ASHA, J,
¶2
The above petition is filed to condone the delay of 95 days in representing the CMA.SR.No.102266 of 2015.
¶3
- Considering the fact that the sufficient reasons have been given in the affidavit filed in support of the petition for condoning the delay. Hence the petition is allowed and the delay of 95 days in representing the CMA.SR.No.102266 of 2015 is condoned.
¶4
- The Registry is directed to number the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
¶5
08.11.2022
¶6
shr
¶8
1/1
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the delay of 95 days in filing the civil miscellaneous appeal can be condoned?
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Petitioner
Coram
AI extract
P.T. ASHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court