R.Kaliyannan v. Sampoornam
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge allowed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking to implead owners of the suit property as additional respondents in an ongoing second appeal, deeming such inclusion necessary for proper adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed; Registry directed to amend records and list matter for final hearing on 08.06.2022.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.6569 of 2022 in S.A.No.1456 of 2001
C.M.P.No.6569 of 2022 in S.A.No.1456 of 2001
R. HEMALATHA, J.
This petition is filed to implead the proposed respondents as parties in the above second appeal and rank them as respondents 10 to 19.
- In the affidavit in support of the petition, it is stated that the proposed respondents are the owners of the suit property having purchased the same from the respondents in the second appeal. It is also their contention that the lessee in the suit property has been impleaded after the death of the sole respondent and therefore, impleading all the owners of the property is absolutely necessary for adjudication of this case.
- The learned counsel for the respondents/appellants did not raise any serious objection in allowing the petition. This Court is also satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence this petition is allowed.
1/3
C.M.P.No.6569 of 2022 in S.A.No.1456 of 2001
- The Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendments in the
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition to implead owners of the suit property as additional respondents in the second appeal should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondents/Appellants
Coram
R. HEMALATHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court