Kamalam v. Kalaimani
Case brief
What is this about?
Court allowed petitions to discharge the mother (first petitioner) from guardianship of appellants and to declare them as majors, satisfying reasons in affidavit, directing registry to amend second appeal records.
What did the court decide?
Petitions allowed; registry directed to carryout amendments in Second Appeal No.1579 of 2002 and list matter on 29.04.2022
What the court decided
C.M.P.Nos.5514 & 5513 of 2022 in S.A.No.1579 of 2002
C.M.P.Nos.5514 & 5513 of 2022
in
S.A.No.1579 of 2002
R.HEMALATHA, J.
These petitions are filed praying to (i) discharge the mother, first petitioner/first appellant from the guardianship of the petitioners 2 & 3 / appellants 2 & 3 and permit them to prosecute the second appeal (ii) to declare the petitioners 2 & 3 / appellants 2 & 3 as a major, respectively.
2.The learned counsel for the respondents did not raise any serious objection and this Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions. Hence, these petitions are allowed.
3.The Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendments in the Second Appeal No.1579 of 2002 and list the matter on 29.04.2022
13.04.2022
mtl
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to discharge the minor from guardianship and permit her to prosecute the second appeal?
Whether to declare the petitioners as majors?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
First Petitioner
- respondent
Petitioner 2
- respondent
Petitioner 3
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court