Rahamathulla v. Syed Hasim
Case brief
What is this about?
N.A. Venkatesh J. allowed CMPs and SA due to returned notices endorsed 'left' despite pendency, impleading deceased respondents' heirs as 7 to 12.
What did the court decide?
Petitions allowed; heirs impleaded as respondents 7-12; registry directed to amend.
What the court decided
1
CMP Nos.4788, 4789, 4790, 4791 and
4792 of 2018
SA No.13 of 2016
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
The notices that were sent to all
the proposed respondents in these petitions were returned with an endorsement “left”. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the pendency of these petitions, all these petitions are allowed and consequently, the legal heirs of the deceased 1st and
3rd respondents are impleaded as proposed respondents 7 to 12 in the second appeal. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment.
11.03.2022
rka
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this court can allow these petitions despite the proposed respondents' returns showing 'left'.
Coram
N.Anand Venkatesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court