Pushparani James v. Danalakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Civil…
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution as respondent was not served notice.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty First day of March Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
CMP.NO.368 OF 2010
IN SA.NO.903 OF 2001
1 PUSHPARAJAN JAMES [ PETITIONERS ]
2 INDIRA SOUNDARARAJAN 3 KENNEDY JAMES 4 SAROJINI DEVADOS ALL 1 TO 4 REP.BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY AGENT GRACE SAMUEL NO.13, SUBRAMANIAR KOIL STREET, KUDHIRKAMAM, PONDICHERRY
5 GRACE SAMUEL NO.13, SUBRAMANIAR KOIL STREET KUDHIRKAMAM, PONDICHERRY
Vs DANALAKSHMI [ RESPONDENT ] D/O.VARADARASU @ SUNDARARAJAN NO.8,THIAGU MUDALIAR STREET, PONDICHERRY.
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to set aside and restore the dismissal of the above S.A.No.903/2001 dated 22.12.2009 by this Hon'ble Court (in CMP.NO.368 OF 2010).
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1 Pushparajan James and others
- respondent
Danalakshmi
Coram
R. Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court