Allowed
M/s.Eid Parry Ltd, v. Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal
Madras HCCMP/20054/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2022 in C.M.A.sr.Nos.20491 and 48073 of…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.20054 and 20056 of 2022 in C.M.A.sr.Nos.20491 and 48073 of 2021
S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. And C.SARAVANAN,J.
Being satisfied with the reasons
stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are
allowed and the delay is allowed.
[S.V.N.,J.] [C.S.N.,J.]
24.11.2022
arr
Note: (i) Registry is directed to number the Appeals, if they are otherwise in order and post for admission.
(ii) Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil for the Respondent.
S.Vaidyanathan
C.Saravanamurthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court