In a regular pending matter, the court allowed a petition to condone a delay in filing a Civil Revision Petition. The court was satisfied with the reasons provided and restored the C.R.P. for hearing on a fixed date.
Petition allowed to condone delay; Civil Revision Petition restored for hearing on 16.11.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No. 18978 of 2022 in C.R.P. No. 1199 of 2017
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
This petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 16.07.2018 dismissing the Civil Revision Petition.
delay of 1355 days in filing the petition to restore the C.R.P. in C.M.P.No. 10808 of 2022 on hearing both sides.
submitted that the petitioner denied the execution of alleged Will deed 16.02.1986 and hence, he has to prove the same by sending the Will for expert opinion. Furthermore, the petitioner has disputed not only the thumb impression, but also his father's signature in the Will in question. Hence, he has filed the above petition to restore the above C.R.P.
and submitted that he has no objection for allowing this petition.
the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition seeking to restore the Civil Revision Petition, this Court is inclined to allow this petition and to restore the C.R.P
08.11.2022
rpp
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.No. 18978 of 2022 in C.R.P. No. 1199 of 2017
08.11.2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay in filing the Civil Revision Petition and restore the matter for hearing?
Petitioner (Revision Petitioner)
Respondents 5 and 6
T.V. THAMILSELVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
