Two judges condoned a 198-day delay by the petitioner in re-presenting appeal papers and ordered the petitions to proceed to file numbers.
Delay of 198 days condoned; petitions ordered to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.18834 & 18839 of 2021 in C.M.P.(SR)Nos.113134 & 113135 of 2019 in W.A.Nos.2297 & 2298 of 2019
M.DURAISWAMY, J. and
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
There is a delay of 198 days in re-presenting the papers in C.M.P.(SR)Nos. 113134 & 113135 of 2019 in W.A.Nos.2297 & 2298 of 2019.
2.The petitioner has satisfactorily explained the reasons for the delay in the affidavit filed in support of the petitions.
3.Being satisfied with reasons, the delay is condoned.
4.The petitions are ordered.
[M.D.,J.] [J.S.N.P.,J.] 04.01.2022
va
Note: The Registry is directed to number the impleading petitions and list the same on 12.01.2022.
2 issues framed by the court
whether to condone the delay of 198 days in re-presenting the appeal papers
whether to order the sub-files
M.DUR AISWAMY
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
