The High Court allowed the impleadment of a proposed fourth respondent in a review application without prejudice to that party's contentions to be raised subsequently.
Impleaded the proposed respondent as the fourth respondent in the review application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.No.177 of 2022 in Rev.Appln.No. 194 of 2017
M.DURAISWAMY, J. and
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
The review applicant has filed the above petition to implead the proposed fourth respondent as the fourth respondent in the review application.
M.DURAISWAMY, J. and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.
[M.D.,J.] [J.S.N.P.,J.] 27.01.2022
mrn
CMP.No.177 of 2022 in Rev.Appln.No. 194 of 2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proposed new party should be impleaded as the fourth respondent in the review application.
Review Applicant
Fourth Respondent
M. Duraismwamy
J. Satya Narayana Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
