Mari Gounder Died, v. Daicy Priyanatha Died
Case brief
What is this about?
2021 in C.R.P. No. 1289 of 2019 T.V.…
What did the court decide?
Legal representatives of deceased 3rd respondent impleaded as respondents 16 to 19.
2021 in C.R.P. No. 1289 of 2019 T.V.…
Legal representatives of deceased 3rd respondent impleaded as respondents 16 to 19.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No. 16469 of 2021
in C.R.P. No. 1289 of 2019
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to bring on record the petitioners/proposed respondents 16 to 19 herein as legal representatives of deceased 3rd respondent.
10.11.2022
rpp
Note :- Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title and post the matter for enquiry on 17.11.2022. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.No. 16469 of 2021
in
C.R.P. No. 1289 of 2019
10.11.2022
T.V. Thamilselvi
Respondents 16 to 19
3rd Respondent (Deceased)
Respondents 2 to 4
T.V. Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court