Allowed

The Inspector General of Registration v. C.P.Ragunathan

Madras HC19 Dec 2022CMP/15517/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed the petitioners to condone the delay of 61 days in filing a writ appeal, accepting the explanation that they sought an opinion from the Special Government Pleader regarding the fitness of the case for filing an appeal before the impugned order was obtained.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 61 days in filing the writ appeal is condoned and the petition is ordered accordingly.

The Inspector General of Registration Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

C.M.P.No.15517 of 2022 in W.A.No. SR 96418 of 2022

¶2

C.M.P.No.15517 of 2022 in W.A.No. SR 96418 of 2022

¶3

THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶4

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

¶5

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)

¶6

This petition has been filed by the petitioners to condone the delay of 61days in filing the writ appeal.

¶7

The service report of the Registry records that the private notice taken on the sole respondent served on 23.09.2022. Proof of service has also been filed by the petitioners. Despite service, no one entered appearance on behalf of the respondent.

¶8

Learned State Government Pleader, appearing for the petitioners, submitted that the petitioners have obtained the certified copy of the impugned order on 23.5.2022 and on 15.6.2022, the same has been addressed to learned Special Government Pleader, Madras High Court for opinion for filing an appeal. He submits that learned Special Government Pleader has given his opinion on 21.7.2022 stating that this is a fit case for filing an appeal and in the

¶9

___________ Page 1 of 3_

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

C.M.P.No.15517 of 2022 in W.A.No. SR 96418 of 2022

¶12

process of getting the certified copy of the impugned order and obtaining opinion, the delay of 61 days occurred. According to learned State Government Pleader, the delay is neither willful nor wanton. Thus, a prayer has been made to condone the delay of 61 days in filing the writ appeal.

¶13

Considering the submission made by learned State

¶14

Government Pleader and having satisfied with the reason stated in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 61 days in filing the writ appeal is condoned.

¶15

Accordingly, the petition is ordered.

¶16

bbr

¶17

___________ Page 2 of 3_

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

C.M.P.No.15517 of 2022 in W.A.No. SR 96418 of 2022

¶20

THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

¶21

bbr

¶22

C.M.P.No.15517 of 2022 in W.A.No. SR 96418 of 2022

¶23

19.12.2022

¶24

___________ Page 3 of 3_

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Inspector General of Registration v. C.P.Ragunathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Inspector General of Registration v. C.P.Ragunathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State Bank of India Vs The District Collector

C.Saravanan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

The South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs The Chief Judicial Magistrate

Shantha Sundaram (Died) Vs The Authorised Officer

K.Saravanan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu Housing Board Vs M.Vishnukumar