Paramaguru v. Palanivel
Case brief
What is this about?
A Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed to condone a delay of 291 days in filing a Review Application. The court found the petitioner’s affidavit reasons justifiable and disposed of the petition in order.
What did the court decide?
The petition to condone the delay of 291 days in filing the Review Application was allowed.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No. 1482 of 2020 in Rev. Appl. SR No. 105428 of 2019
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 291 days in filing the present Review Application.
- Mr. J.Rajmohan, learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that after dismissal of Second Appeal, the counsel has not informed the same to the petitioner and also he has not given any certified copy of judgment passed by this Court. The petitioner came to know about the dismissal only in the month of April 2019 and thereafter, he has filed the Review Application. However, the delay of 291 days arose. Hence, he has filed this petition to condone the delay.
- Mr.M.Tamizavel, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 appeared and raised his formal objections.
- Considering the facts and circumstances, and also considering the reasons stated by the petitioner in the affidavit is justifiable, this petition is ordered.
22.08.2022
rpp
Note :- Registry is directed to number the above petition if the same are
otherwise found to be in order and post the matter on 30.08.2022.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 291 days in filing a Review Application should be condoned given the petitioner’s affidavit reasons.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Unnamed Petitioner
- respondent
Unnamed Respondents 1 and 2
Coram
T.V. Thamilselvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court