Current court condoned a 135-day delay in filing a writ appeal. The Special Government Pleader for the second respondent opposed none, despite the first respondent's absence. The application was ordered accordingly.
Delay of 135 days in filing writ appeal is condoned; the writ appeal is admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.14284 of 2022 and WA SR No.87753 of 2022
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.
This application has been filed to condone the delay of 135 days in filing writ appeal against the impugned order dated 11.11.2021 in W.P.No.23671 of 2021.
This court, on 30.08.2022, issued
notice to the respondents. Record produced by the Registry shows that notice has been duly served on both the respondents.
Ms.Anitha, learned Special
Government Pleader, appearing for the second respondent has no objection for condoning the delay. Though served, first respondent is not represented.
The delay is therefore, condoned and this petition is ordered.
tar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 135 days in filing a writ appeal against an impugned order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
D.KRISHNAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
