The court dismissed three applications filed by the petitioner/appellant to set aside abatement caused by the death of a respondent (Muniammal), condone a delay of 1734 days, and implead legal representatives of the deceased respondent.
The three applications were allowed; registry directed to carry out amendment and post matter on 09.01.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P Nos.13465, 13466 and 13467 of 2020 in C.M.A.No.161 of 2013
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
these three applications.
4.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions, these three petitions are allowed.
on 09.01.2023.
19.12.2022
uma
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
uma
C.M.P Nos.13465, 13466 & 13467 of 2022
in. C.M.A No.161 of 2013
19.12.2022
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the petition to set aside abatement due to death of the 2nd respondent should be condoned and legal representatives brought on record.
Whether the abatement of the appeal caused by the death of the 2nd respondent should be set aside.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner/Appellant
Muniammal
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
