Dismissed
P.Selvaraj v. Johnson Chellappa
Madras HCCMA(MD)/1157/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.A(MD)No.1157 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 02.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI
C.M.A(MD)No.1157 of 2012 in
M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012
P.Selvaraj ... Appellant/Respondent/Plaintiff
Vs
1.Johnson Chellappa 2.Maria Reeta ... Respondents/Appellants/Defendants
PRAYER :-
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, to set aside the order of remand, dated 11.04.2012 rendered in A.S.No.04 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Judge cum Fast Track Court at Virudhunagar, by setting aside the decree and judgment, dated 12.04.2010 rendered in O.S.No.64 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar.
For Appellant : Mr.N.Subramanian For R1 : Died For R2 : Mr.M.Musthafakhan
1 / 4
C.M.A(MD)No.1157 of 2012
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed against the order of remand made in A.S.No.04 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Judge cum Fast Track Court at Virudhunagar, dated 11.04.2012 by setting aside the decree and judgment, dated 12.04.2010 made in O.S.No.64 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar.
2.The appellant is the plaintiff. The respondents are the defendants in the original suit in O.S.No.64 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar. The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of money on the basis of a pro-note. The suit was decreed by the trial Court. Against the decree and judgment, the defendants preferred an appeal in A.S.No.4 of 2010 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Virudhunagar. The learned Additional District Judge set aside the judgment and decree and remanded the matter back to the trial Court. Against the order of remand, the appellant herein filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
2 / 4
C.M.A(MD)No.1157 of 2012
3.When the matter was taken up for arguments, a memo was filed by the second respondent stating that the civil suit in O.S.No.64 of 2008 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar was amicably settled before the Lok Adalat on 08.12.2018. The copy of the order passed in the Lok Adalat was also filed. The second respondent, who was present, has admitted that the matter was amicably settled before the Lok Adalat.
4.In view of the submission made by both the counsel, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
02.09.2022
Index: Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
sji
To
3 / 4
C.M.A(MD)No.1157 of 2012
R.THARANI, J.
sji
C.M.A(MD)No.1157 of 2012
02.09.2022
4 / 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil miscellaneous appeal invoking Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, is maintainable in view of the settlement of the underlying suit in Lok Adalat.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Selvaraj
Johnson Chellappa
Maria Reeta
R. Tharani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court