Disposed

The Divisional Manager v. J.Rajakumary

Madras HC12 Nov 2022CMA/902/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this National Lok Adalat award, a compromise was reached between an insurance company (appellant) and claimants (respondents) regarding a Motor Accidents Claims Appeal. The Tribunal's award of Rs.44.26 lakh was reduced to Rs.41 lakh via mutual agreement, which was subsequently deposited by the insurer.

What did the court decide?

Compensation quantum modified to Rs.41,00,000/- with interest; appeal disposed of; court fee refunded.

The Divisional Manager Vs J.Rajakumary — Insurance | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

C.M.A.No.902 of 2022

¶2

\HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI

¶3

National Lok Adalat organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Saturday, the 12^th November, 2022

¶4

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶5

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶6

Presided over by:The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶7

Members:(1) Mr. K.Ramakrishnan, M.A., LL.M., District Judge (Retd.) (2) Ms. V.Vijayalakshmi, Advocate

¶8

CMA.No.902 of 2022

¶9

(Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the award and decree passed, dated 21.12.2020 in MCOP.No.1187 of 2016 , on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, I Additional District & Sessions Judge at Cuddalore.

¶10

The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd, DO, Puducherry-1

Appellant

Vs.

1.J.Rajakumary

2.J.Janarthanan 3.J.Jayasuriya 4.M.Manjula

¶15

Respondent(s)

¶16

This case came up for settlement before the National Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Mr.S.Vadivel, the learned counsel for the Appellant/Insurance company and M/s.Ramya.V.Rao, the learned counsel for R1 to R3/claimants are present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both the parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:-

¶17

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶18

This Appeal has been filed by the Appellant/ Insurance Company against the impugned award dated 21.12.2020 in MCOP.No.1187 of 2016 , on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, I Additional District & Sessions Judge at Cuddalore.

¶19

The Quantum of Compensation awarded by the Tribunal is Rs.44,26,976/ - with interest at 7.5 % per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit of compensation. Being dissatisfied with the award amount, the Appellant/ Insurance Company has filed the present appeal.

¶20

After due deliberation and consultation, both the parties have agreed to modify the award to a sum of Rs.41,00,000/-(Rupees Forty one Lakhs only) with interest as full quit.

¶21

The Appellant/Insurance Company is directed to deposit the above said modified award amount of Rs.41,00,000/- with interest, after giving credit to the amount already deposited if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such deposit, R1 to R3/claimants are permitted to withdraw their respective

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1 of 3

¶23

C.M.A.No.902 of 2022

¶24

shares as apportioned by the Tribunal.

¶25

The quantum of the award amount has only been modified, whereas the interest and other features ordered by the Tribunal shall remain the same for the above modified award .

¶26

The Tribunal is directed to disburse the award amount to the claimants' Savings Bank Account, through RTGS/NEFT, on proper identification of the account of the claimants in accordance with the terms of the award, without insisting on any formal permission petition. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of accordingly.

¶27

The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd, DO, Puducherry-1

¶28

Counsel for the Appellants

¶29

1.J.Rajakumary

¶30

2.J.Janarathanan

¶31

3.J.Jayasuriya Counsel for the Respondents

¶32

This National Lok Adalat Award is passed in terms of the above settlement. The Court fee paid shall be refunded to the parties in the manner provided under the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

¶33

JUDGE

¶34

MEMBER MEMBER

¶35

To: The Parties/Advocates concerned. Copy to:

¶36

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, I Additional District & Sessions Judge at Cuddalore.

¶37

2.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

¶38

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

¶39

4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.+2 copies

¶40

lok

¶41

CMA.No.902 of 2022

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Page 2 of 3

C.M.A.No.902 of 2022

12.11.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

Page 3 of 3

The Divisional Manager v. J.Rajakumary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Divisional Manager v. J.Rajakumary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amutha, F/A.25 Years Vs State by

S. Natrajan Vs Ayyasamy (Died)

Tiruvallurvar Transport Corporation Vs Priya

M/S.Bajaj Allianz Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs a.Asogan

Rajavalli Vs M/S.Nsk Blue Metals

K.Chithra Vs D.Nirmalraj