M.Varadharajan v. Sumathi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal as infructuous because the appellant's counsel demonstrated that the respondent wife had died, rendering the appeal subservient.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
C.M.A.NO.846 OF 2016
M.Varadharajan
... Appellant
Sumathi
... Respondent
Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of Family Court Act, against the judgment and decree dated 01.03.2016 in F.C.O.P.No.38 of 2015 on the file of Family Court, Chengalpattu.
For Appellant : Mr.C.Prabakaran For Respondent : Mr.V.Subramanian
J U D G M E N T (Judgment of this Court was made by V.M.VELUMANI,J.)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil miscellaneous appeal survives the death of the respondent wife.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.Varadharajan
- respondent
Sumathi
Coram
V.M.Velumani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court