Vanitha v. Vijay
Case brief
What is this about?
Special leave petition against the award passed in the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. Found that the evidence on the side of the petitioners was purely bald allegation. The Court found that there was no merit to interfere with and accordingly the appeal is dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The Appeal is dismissed at the stage of admission itself. No costs.
What the court decided
C.M.A.No.2690 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.12.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
C.M.A.No.2690 of 2022
1.Vanitha (45), W/o.Late Nagarajan,
2.Vignesh (26), S/o.Nagarajan
Both are residing at No.2/279, Bharathiar Street, Tranquebar Village & Taluk, Mayiladuthurai. ... Appellants Vs.
1.Vijay (25), S/o.Nagarajan, Residing at No.1/279, Bharathiar Street, Tranquebar Town & Taluk
2.National Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Managing Director, Having office at Hero Moto Corp. Vertical, Delhi D.O.803, 8th Floor, Tower C, Konnect O.S. Building, Opp. to New Delhi Railway Station, Bhav Bhuti Marg, New Delhi 110 002. ... Respondents
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the findings of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal regarding the lack of positive evidence for vehicle negligence.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vanitha (45), W/o. Nagarajan and Vignesh (26), S/o. Nagarajan
- respondent
Vijay (25), S/o. Nagarajan
- respondent
National Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Managing Director
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court