C. Marimuthu v. S. Eswari
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court disposed of a writ petition disputing retirement denial and non-payment of dues. Court directed respondents to grant leave encashment benefits and for petition to submit fresh representation regarding outstanding funds.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner at liberty to submit fresh representation; respondents directed to consider petitioner for Leave Encashment grants as per rules.
What the court decided
W.P.No.44679 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.44679 of 2016 and
W.M.P.No.38525 of 2016
V.Kannappan
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Sub-Collector, Madurantakkam, Kancheepuram District.
2.The District Collector, Kancheepuram District. ..Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent in connection with the impugned order passed by him in RC No.3161/2008/A dated 30.11.2016 and quash the same and direct the respondents to disburse the Special Provident Fund, Encashment of earned leave to the petitioner within the stipulated time.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to Special Provident Fund and Encashment of earned leave despite pending criminal case and suspension.
Whether the respondents are directed to grant Leave Encashment benefits as per rules.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Kannappan
- respondent
The Sub-Collector, Madurantakkam, Kancheepuram District
- respondent
The District Collector, Kancheepuram District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court