Mohanambal v. Seventheeswaran
Case brief
What is this about?
This appeal suit filed under Section 96 of the CPC was dismissed as settled out of court based on the endorsement made by the appellant's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Appeal Suit dismissed as settled out of Court; No order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 18.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Appeal Suit No.566 of 2012
- Mohanambal,
- Kanagarathinam,
- Thirugnanasambanda Moorthy ... Appellants
- Seventheeswaran
- Pavayammal
- C.Kanagaraj
(R-2 exparte and hence given up) ...Respondents
Prayer: This First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of C.P.C praying against the judgment and decree of the Learned Additional District Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No.II, Salem in O.S.No.137 of 2009 dated 14.02.2012.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohanambal
- appellant
Kanagarathinam
- appellant
Thirugnanasambanda Moorthy
- respondent
Seventheeswaran
- respondent
Pavayammal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court