Partly allowed

Vijayalakshmi v. S.Janaki

Madras HC26 Apr 2022AS/389/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the District Judge's award of damages. The court declared title in favour of the Plaintiffs and directed the Defendants to hand over vacant possession of the property within three months.

What did the court decide?

Set aside part of the lower court's judgment (damages); declared title in favour of Plaintiffs; directed Defendants to hand over vacant possession within 3 months.

Vijayalakshmi Vs S.Janaki — Partition | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

TUESDAY THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.KANNAMMAL

¶5

Appeal Suit No.389 of 2014

¶6

Vijayalakshmi 2. V.Anandakrishnan 3. V.Srinivasan 4. V.Vijaykumar .. Appellants/Respondents

¶7

Vrs. 1. S.Janaki 2. S.Vasudevan 3. S.Sivakumar 4. S.Arunprakash .. Respondents/Plaintiffs

¶8

Prayer: Appeal against the judgment and decree of the Court of the District Judge, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris dated 21.02.2014 made in O.S.No.2 of 2011.

¶9

Decree : This Appeal coming on for hearing on this Monday the Twenty First Day of February, Two Thousand and Twenty Two and upon perusing the grounds of Appeal the judgment and decree of the Lower Appellate Court and the Court of First Instance and material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.R.Sivakumar, Counsel for the Appellants and of Mr.S.Vadivel Murugan, Counsel for the Respondents and this case having stood over this consideration till this day and this Court, while allowing this Appeal Suit in part and in modification of the order of the Court below doth order and decree as follows:

¶10

that the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris dated 21.02.2014 made in O.S.No.2 of 2011 be and herebyis setting aside in so far as it relates to the award of damages at the rate of Rs.5,000/(Rupees Five Thousand only) with interest at 12 % per annum from the date of plaint till the date of payment and Rs.250/- (Rupees Two Hundred and Fifty only) per day from the date of plaint till the date of handing over vacant possession;

¶11

that their title to the suit property be and hereby is declared in favour of the Respondents/Plaintiffs;

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

that the Appellants/Defendants be and hereby are directed to handover the vacant possession of the suit property to the Respondents/Plaintiffs within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment;

¶14

that there be no costs in this Appeal Suit.

¶15

SCHEDULE

¶16

Registration District : Nilgiris Registration Sub District : Ootacamund Jt NO.1 Town and Municipality : Ootacamund Taluk : Ootacamund Locaility : New Agraharam R.S.No. Extent 1946 00.01-6/16 acres 1947 00.00-2/16 acres ................ 00.01.8/16 acres or 650 sq.ft with the residential building thereon bearing Door No.46A of Old Ward No.8, New Ward No.11, Municipal Asst.No.20169.

¶17

The above property is now re-surveyed as R.S.No.E/17-149 measuring 0.00.66 hectares (full extent).

¶18

Boundaries of the Property :

¶19

North : Pathway South : New Agraharam Road East : House Belonging to T.K.Srirangan West : House belonging to A.R.Aruna Chettiar & Sons.

¶20

Plaintiffs

¶21

We declare that the description of the property given above it true to our knowledge and belief and sign the same at Ootacamund this 21^st day of January 2011.

¶22

Plaintiffs

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)

¶25

//True copy//

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

To:

¶29

The District Judge, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris.

¶30

The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

¶31

+1cc to Mr.R.Sivakumar, Advocate SR.No.29094

¶32

+1cc to Mr.S.Vadivel Murugan, Advocate SR.No.28253

¶33

DATED : 26/04/2022

¶34

DECREE :

¶35

Appeal Suit No.389 of 2014

¶36

This Appeal Suit is allowed in part and in modification preferred against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris dated 21.02.2014 made in O.S.No.2 of 2011 etc., as stated within.

¶37

KJ(CO) GMY(30/05/2022)

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Vijayalakshmi v. S.Janaki

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijayalakshmi v. S.Janaki

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Ayyappan Vs G.R.Thiagasundara Mudaliar

The Special Tahsildar (La) Vs Chinnappa Gounder

Devendran Vs The Fit Person

R.Murugesan Vs Malathy

B.Vetriselvan Vs T.Ganesan

Mr.D.Samuel Robert, Vs a. Cithambaranthan Died.