This is a one-line order dismissing an appeal suit filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code. The appellant was granted liberty to file a fresh appeal if any legal heirs are found to be alive in the future.
Appeal suit dismissed with liberty to file fresh appeal if legal heirs are found alive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date : 28.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE TMT. JUSTICE S. KANNAMMAL
A.S.No.353 of 2011
A. Suryanarayana
... Appellant/ Plaintiff
Vs.
PRAYER: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 19.10.2010 in O.S.No.212 of 2007 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court I, Poonamallee and allow the appeal.
For Appellant : M/s.V.P. Raman
For Respondents: M/s. C. Usha [for R-1] M/s. S.G. Emberumanar[for R2 & R3]
J U D G M E N T
This Appeal Suit has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Decree of the learned Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court I, Poonamallee.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ggs
To:
The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Poonamallee, Chennai.
Copy To
The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras-104.
+1cc to Mr.V.P. Raman, Advocate SR.No.21487 +1cc to Mr.A.E.Ravichandran, Advocate SR.No.20779
A.S.No.353 of 2011
SV(CO) GMY(10/05/2022)
A. Suryanarayana
A. Harnath
Nunna Ramanakumar
T. Mark
S. Kannammal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
